Find equipment by installation point and separation task.
All magnetic separators →Start with the material or production line you need to protect.
All applications →Compare technologies, check parameters and prepare your RFQ.
All guides →See the factory, quality checks and answers before you request a quotation.
Choose the separation route from the iron mineral, liberation, particle size and dry or wet feed condition, then validate the result against the product specification your process actually needs.

Final equipment configuration and performance targets should stay tied to the actual material and agreed test conditions.
The same iron impurity can be acceptable in one silica sand market and unacceptable in another. Define the downstream product before deciding how far the magnetic stage needs to go.
Iron-bearing minerals can affect color and product specification, so the separation route often needs tighter control of weak magnetic contamination as well as free ferrous material.
Selection focus: current assay, target assay, mineral form and whether the feed is dry or wet.Mechanical iron, scale and wear debris can enter during handling or reclamation. Magnetic protection or drum separation can be useful when the contamination is liberated and strongly responsive.
Selection focus: contamination source, particle size and feed presentation.Discoloring hematite, limonite, iron-bearing mica and related phases may require a higher-intensity route when conventional magnetic pre-cleaning reaches its practical limit.
Selection focus: mineralogy, liberation and required visual / chemical quality.Magnetic separation can remove responsive iron-bearing phases, but it should be treated as one stage in a broader purification flowsheet rather than a guarantee of final high-purity quartz quality.
Selection focus: liberation, fine inclusions and downstream purification sequence.Fe₂O₃ tells you how much iron is present. It does not tell you where that iron sits or how it will respond to a magnetic separator.
Steel fragments, scale, grinding wear and exposed metallic iron introduced by handling equipment.
What this means: usually the easiest iron fraction to remove magnetically when it is exposed to the working zone.Liberated magnetite or another strongly responsive magnetic fraction mixed with the silica sand.
What this means: a magnetic drum may be enough when the particles are fully liberated and the feed is presented correctly.Hematite, limonite, iron-bearing mica or another liberated weakly magnetic fraction.
What this means: this is where conventional drum separation often reaches its limit and a higher-intensity route should be reviewed.Iron-bearing inclusions, intergrowth or staining that is not sufficiently liberated for selective magnetic capture.
What this means: more magnetic strength does not fix poor liberation.
Do not make one separator carry every iron-removal duty. Match each stage to the magnetic response and physical condition of the material.
Typical equipment: magnetic drum or another suitable magnetic protection stage.
Additional separation may be required when weak magnetic iron remains in the material.
Typical duty: liberated weak magnetic impurities in dry, free-flowing silica or quartz sand.
For dry, free-flowing sand with liberated weakly magnetic iron, compare a high-intensity magnetic roller separator. Material testing helps determine whether the separator can remove weak magnetic iron while maintaining acceptable product recovery.
Typical duty: fine silica slurry where dispersion and high-gradient capture are needed for weak magnetic particles.
Wet separation should be selected when the material condition and particle size require slurry processing. A wet separator does not automatically mean higher purity.

Better starting point when:
Better starting point when:
Magnetic separation normally works best as a controlled stage inside the purification flowsheet, not as a substitute for liberation or another required purification mechanism.

When the material response cannot be judged reliably from chemistry and catalog specifications, test a representative sample and compare the measured iron content before and after separation.
Provide representative silica sand, particle-size information and existing assay data.
State the current Fe / Fe₂O₃ condition, required product result and downstream use.
Compare magnetic response or candidate routes under documented feed and equipment conditions.
Use the measured fractions to decide the next equipment or process step.

If material testing is required, please provide representative samples together with basic material information. Test conditions and evaluation criteria will be confirmed before testing.

For an application page, the drum should be treated as one available process stage, not as the default answer to every silica sand iron-removal problem.
A workable proposal needs the process interface, not only tons per hour.

Confirm the machine, interfaces, discharge arrangement and drawing-controlled items included in the agreed scope.
When a field reading is specified, define the instrument, probe orientation, measurement position, working gap and test condition.
When the decision concerns residual iron or product quality, compare the real feed and separated fractions under documented conditions.

Start from the impurity, particle size, dry or wet process and required product instead of selecting from a catalog headline.
Separate strong-magnetic pre-cleaning from deeper weak-magnetic purification so each stage has a defined job.
Translate the selected route into feed, discharge, footprint, utility and control interfaces for the actual line.
Keep any performance target attached to the agreed material, measurement method, equipment configuration and operating condition.
If your material needs testing or a custom separator configuration, we will confirm the work and equipment included in the quotation.
Organize the enquiry from what you have now to what the finished product must become.
There is no single best separator for every silica sand. A magnetic drum can be used for liberated strongly magnetic contamination and pre-cleaning. Dry high-intensity separation is more relevant when liberated weak magnetic minerals remain in a dry free-flowing feed. Fine slurry may require wet high-gradient separation. Mineralogy, liberation, particle size and the required product determine the route.
Yes, when the Fe-bearing minerals are magnetically responsive and sufficiently liberated. The achievable reduction depends on mineralogy, liberation, particle size, feed condition, separator type and operating window. Fe₂O₃ chemistry alone does not predict the result.
Not always. Free ferrous and strongly magnetic contamination may be removed in an earlier magnetic stage. A higher-intensity or high-gradient route becomes more relevant when liberated hematite, limonite, iron-bearing mica or other weak magnetic particles remain.
Dry separation is practical when the material is sufficiently free-flowing and can be presented in a controlled layer. Wet separation becomes relevant when the feed already exists as slurry, fine particles benefit from dispersion, or a high-gradient capture route is required. The process condition should drive the choice.
No. Gauss is magnetic flux density at a defined measurement point. The separation result also depends on the particle's magnetic response, field gradient, working distance, feed depth, particle size, speed and discharge geometry. A condition-free Gauss value does not prove removal efficiency.
Start with particle size, feed rate, moisture or slurry solids, current Fe / Fe₂O₃, required product result, known impurity mineralogy, dry or wet process condition, installation space and inlet / outlet geometry. Add XRF, XRD, samples and previous separation test data when available.
Send your current material analysis, particle size, target iron level and process condition. Corvelan can review whether the project starts with strong-magnetic pre-cleaning, requires a higher-intensity route, or needs material testing before equipment selection.
Any capacity, field-strength, purity, recovery or iron-removal target should be confirmed against the agreed material, equipment configuration, operating conditions and acceptance method before it is treated as a project commitment.